CJ Abrams, in dynasty and redraft. The FanRanked staff dynasty board has Abrams ahead, Abrams #14 and Neto #29, and the expert consensus agrees (#19 and #42). The community rates them even, FRV 74.0 and 76.0. For 2026 redraft, the consensus has Abrams ahead, #5 to #41.
JD on CJ Abrams (Oct 2, 2026): In full transparency, I originally wrote this blurb thinking I was going to rank him 11th overall. As I thought more and more about it, I just got less comfortable with his 2026 stats and how unreliable they are based on his underlying metrics CJ Abrams might be heading down a path where he is more value in fantasy than in real life, but we are totally OK with that as fantasy diehards right? As of September 25, he has piled up 33 home runs in 34 stolen bases this year, making him on of the 3 players hit 30/30, along with PCA and Elly. (There was actually 7 last year, which was a record I didn’t realize was broken until I was doing research). He’s done that despite a relatively pedestrian underlying Statcast profile and horrible defense (1st percentile in both fielding run value and outs above average). When I see a profile like this, it makes me wonder how long he can perform at the elite level. It was also concerning that the Nationals were shopping him around at the trade deadline, which seems to suggest that maybe teams don't see as much real-life value as his fantasy profile would suggest. I can see an argument for selling high on him right now and maybe trading for a Kevin McGonigle or Sal Stewart type, based on their youth and well-rounded profiles.
JD on Zach Neto (Oct 20, 2026): It's a shame that Zach Neto gets overlooked as one of the truly elite players in the game. For all the hate that the Angels get about their player development skills and rushing prospects, Neto seems to be one of the players who has thrived despite the accelerated timelines. He has put up three straight years of 20/20 seasons and been an overall net positive contributor in both runs and RBIs. This was really the first year where his batting average was a liability, but at .239 you can stomach it when the other four categories are great, if not elite. Sure, he's not putting up these numbers with amazing peripherals and he does strike out a lot, but you don't have to pay a top-25 price to get him and his contributions. In a lot of dynasty rankings he sits outside of the top 40, which is insane to me for a guy entering his age 26 season coming off of arguably his best season as a major leaguer. I would be taking the discount here if it's available in your league all day.
Data as of . Consensus boards refresh daily; the staff board moves when it is republished.
| Metric | CJ Abrams | Zach Neto |
|---|---|---|
| Team | WAS | LAA |
| Position | SS | SS |
| Age | 25 | 25 |
| Staff Dynasty Rank | #14 | #29 |
| Dynasty Consensus Rank | #19 | #42 |
| Redraft Consensus Rank | #5 | #41 |
| FRV (FanRanked Value) | 74.0 | 76.0 |
| Expert Sources | 9 | 9 |
| Dynasty Rank Range | #12–#27 | #28–#70 |
| Rest-of-Season Value | - | $1 |
| $ Earned Year to Date | - | $22 |
| ROS Rank (Top 300) | - | #193 |
| 30-Day Consensus Move | Up 1 spot | Up 2 spots |
| Stat | CJ Abrams | Zach Neto |
|---|---|---|
| PA | 654 | 704 |
| HR | 33 | 27 |
| R | 93 | 102 |
| RBI | 106 | 77 |
| SB | 34 | 24 |
| AVG | .261 | .239 |
| OBP | .336 | .330 |
| SLG | .497 | .436 |
| OPS | .834 | .766 |
| wOBA | .358 | .336 |
| xwOBA | .333 | .317 |
Price a CJ Abrams-for-Zach Neto trade in the Dynasty Trade Calculator · compare their rest-of-season dollars in the Roto & Redraft Trade Analyzer